Is doubt the key to knowledge essay

As long as there was no doubt to reach a conclusion, he was right; so, his process of radical doubt is fully employed in his Meditations. It opens one to inquisition and compels a reassessment of a given truth, allowing for improved revisions, thereby furthering gains in knowledge.

Sharpe, Alfred.

With knowledge doubt increases examples

In this regard, doubt certainly cannot be attributed as the key to knowledge as claimed. Thus, is knowledge in science then, provisional? Thus, although doubt lends to the progress of science and hence knowledge, it also has limitations which might prove detrimental to the growth of knowledge. Theories held as scientific knowledge will remain so until they are doubted and contested against; challenged by new experiments and exploration into areas opposing the theory in question. This increases doubt in which increases knowledge because if one does not doubt what is already known what motivation will be present to learn more. In order to conduct the analysis three main knowledge claims are identified which are subsequently analyzed with the positivism, critical rationalism and social-constructivism view on science as described and defined by Benton and Craib The first examples, regarding mathematics move from a personal example on how the student visualizes her own learning in class to a more sophisticated topic like the way conjectures are dealt with, emphasizing effective links to ways of knowing, especially reason. This raises the question: Does increased doubt emulate curiosity? In conclusion, due to the broadness and ambiguity of the knowledge areas of Science and History, it is impossible to accurately evaluate doubt and its ability to present itself as the key to attaining knowledge. How do we know? In this light, it is important to look at whether certainty or doubt can bring us to a more secure grasp on our knowledge. This essay will seek to address the extent to which doubt is manifested as a key to knowledge regarding two areas of knowledge, Science and History. Historical revisionism is an academic field of study in history in which orthodox views on evidence, motives and decision-making processes surrounding a historical event are revised and reinterpreted [1]. Knowledge can come from our personal experience as well.

However, one of the many theories of the black hole might actually be true but as nobody can prove it so, scientists in the field may invest pointless effort into developing new theories instead of directing that effort into proving the theory, which is actually true.

Starting with the First Meditations, he discusses about doubt. A clear approach using different perspectives shown in real-life examples related to different areas of knowledge can be easily identified.

essay on doubt

Nonetheless, through careful study and research on these various areas of knowledge, this essay presents the stand that doubt, to a large extent, is an indispensable and important factor as the key to knowledge.

Doubt allows us to question the world around us in which allows our curiosity to flow. Thus, it is evident that through the use of scientific theories, unless disproved otherwise, knowledge is updated and will remain as such through continual doubt.

Doubt is the key to knowledge tok essay example

Constant repeated eliminations of older theories have occurred and replaced because doubt questioned their validity. As a Persian proverb once said to have progress in knowledge it is necessary to doubt. What is the function of doubt? Although it is the voice of an uncertain conscious, it is not to be viewed as negative but as a way of knowing because doubt allows all knowledge to be researched and apparent. This is true in natural science when empirical experiments are conducted to accept or reject a hypothesis. At one point in time, it was normal for human beings to own one another and a man could discipline his wife with physical violence. We often think that there is no room for doubt within faith, that doubt is weakness. Theories held as scientific knowledge will remain so until they are doubted and contested against; challenged by new experiments and exploration into areas opposing the theory in question. On the importance of certainty There is a push towards a very homogenized way of thinking in modern culture. Woman were encouraged to be voluptuous then boyish then athletic and then resembling drug addicts all over the course of a single lifetime. This is evident within the science community Before the scientific community advanced technologically, they felt confident in the little they knew, but as technology advanced, the more evidence became provable and knowledge expanded.

To differentiate, doubt does not emulate curiosity, it is of human nature to want to understand the relationship between cause and effect in order to make few less errors. Throughout the history of Science, knowledge has been derived from the selfsame processes.

Who said doubt is the key to knowledge

The basis of the progress of Science is through inferred or possibly imagined hypotheses, by scientists attempting to determine and establish meaning to the unexplained. The Rape of Nanking is a historical event known for the engaging of the Japanese army in brutal activities of mass rape, theft and murder on the Nanking populace. Researching for my extended essay, I did not know a lot about Psychology. Hence, continual doubt might actually lead to the elimination of the correct theory, resulting in a regression of knowledge. Without doubt, one would believe anything he or she is told; it is a natural filter for the information thrust upon us. The second is epistemic curiosity, this is our love of acquiring knowledge and is experienced when we anticipate a reward in form of the knowledge we gain. I began to doubt the knowledge I had, it motivated me to do more research. Any human being who hopes to not get swept away in the sea of disturbing trends needs to have certainty about what is right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable. Galileo findings did not convince anyone, the church and the science community mocked his intelligence and was put on house arrest because the people and the science community believed that the geocentric model was correct due to the sun circling earth changing night to day. I found my answer not long ago about how it is related to another issue of reincarnation and bringing over karma.
Rated 10/10 based on 96 review
Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay Example