Was the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki justified essay
Takahashi, who was 14 at the time, became director of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum and a campaigner against nuclear weapons. Is the use of the atomic bomb something that can be justified even after it have killed and has a lasting effect on certain lands in Japan?
No it was not. Wow, you're a moron. In the case of conventional bombs, you have to drop many, one after another, to get such an effect. Therefore, the US created unconditional terms of surrender, knowingly going against the Japanese ethic of honour and against the institute of the emperor, whom most Americans probably wanted dead.
The atomic bombing was indiscriminate killing, but that boundary was crossed with the Tokyo firebombing, and at Dresden, and earlier when Japan bombed Chongqing in China. A lot of people forget that WWII isn't some Napoleonic Wars of the s where it's just soldiers meet each other in the battlefield to settle the issue.
Why did the us bomb hiroshima
Wow, you're a moron. Can you imagine what a slaughter it would be to invade Japan? I think the Allies could have pressured Japan to end the war by demonstrating the power of the atomic bomb, by dropping the bomb not on a city but somewhere else. The Second World War was debatably the most consequential period of the 20th century. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. But the U. Roy: The price to keep the USSR in check was steep: the use of a weapon of mass destruction that caused around , deaths most of them civilians and massive suffering through radiation. Support[ edit ] It would prevent many U. Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems. The atom bombs achieved their desired effects by causing maximum devastation. That's only speculation. According to the official Navy Department Library website, "The day Iwo Jima assault resulted in more than 26, American casualties, including 6, dead" with 19, wounded. None of the Joint Chiefs ever made such a claim, although one inventive author has tried to make it appear that Leahy did by braiding together several unrelated passages from the admiral's memoirs. Steel starts to melt at 1, degrees, so that was much hotter than molten steel.
based on 72 review